Emerald Pages
◆
How MIT Sidestepped Tenure to Silence a Professor Over Colonization Course
Tenured linguistics professor Michel DeGraff proposed a class linking language, colonialism, and liberation in Haiti and Palestine. MIT didn't fire him—it stripped his department, barred his teaching, and left him on the payroll. His federal lawsuit argues that's a "de facto" termination.
Photo: The New York Times
Tenure is supposed to be the ironclad shield of academia. It is the institution's promise that a professor cannot be fired or severely disciplined without a rigorous, peer-driven process, explicit proof of gross misconduct, or documented financial exigency. So when a tenured MIT linguistics professor was stripped of his departmental affiliation and reassigned as a nebulous "faculty at large," it raised a fundamental question: Does tenure actually protect a professor's right to teach, or does it merely guarantee a paycheck?
That is the precise paradox at the center of the case of Professor Michel DeGraff. According to details reported by The New York Times, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and documented in a federal lawsuit he filed against the university, DeGraff's ordeal began with a course proposal in December 2023, just months after the October 7 attacks. He envisioned a class titled: "Language and Linguistics for Decolonization and Liberation and for Peace and Community Building — From the River to the Sea in Palestine and Israel to the Mountaintops of Haiti and Beyond."
The course was designed as a linguistics class, applying his established academic framework—how language is weaponized in power dynamics and anti-colonial struggles—to the rhetoric surrounding Palestine, drawing parallels to his life's work on Haitian Creole. But the title contained the phrase "from the river to the sea," a deeply polarized slogan that many Jewish groups and university donors interpret as a call for the elimination of the State of Israel.
MIT's internal curriculum panel rejected the course. They did not cite the slogan as the reason. Instead, the panel ruled that DeGraff—an expert in Creole languages and a native of Haiti—lacked the specific regional, historical, and geopolitical expertise required to teach a class centered on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
DeGraff protested the decision aggressively. He sent a flurry of internal emails to university administrators, decrying the rejection as a "new McCarthyism," and publicly criticized the university on social media. It was this pushback, the administration claims, that triggered the disciplinary action.
The Administrative Loophole: Reassignment vs. Termination
Under traditional academic rules, stripping a tenured professor of their position requires an incredibly high legal bar. To avoid this hurdle, universities have increasingly relied on a distinct operational strategy: reassignment and suspension rather than outright termination. MIT did not technically fire DeGraff. Instead, they stripped his departmental affiliation and reassigned him as a "faculty at large."
The sanctions were multifaceted and specifically designed to bypass the economic protections of tenure:
- Removal from Department: DeGraff was pushed out of MIT's linguistics section, severing his academic home and collegial ties.
- Barred from Teaching: He was prohibited from teaching autumn courses, removing him from the classroom and student mentorship.
- Denied Access to Mentees: He was denied access to new graduate students, effectively halting his academic legacy and research pipeline.
- Withheld Pay Raise: A scheduled salary increase was denied, a direct financial penalty.
- Paid Status Retained: Crucially, he remains on the university payroll, allowing MIT to argue in court that they have not violated his economic tenure rights or stripped him of his livelihood.
MIT administrators cited "disruptive conduct" and violations of university procedures rather than the course proposal itself. But DeGraff's lawsuit argues that stripping a professor of their department, students, and teaching duties constitutes a "de facto" termination of their academic freedom, even if the direct deposits keep coming.
The "Expertise" Defense and the Political Firestorm
The "expertise" defense was a pretext for political censorship. Tenured professors are routinely granted wide latitude to design courses that apply their specific methodology to new global case studies. Within DeGraff's own department, Noam Chomsky spent decades lecturing and writing on Middle Eastern geopolitics without ever holding a formal degree in political science or Middle Eastern studies.
The course was proposed during a period of immense external pressure on MIT. The university was under scrutiny from Congress, wealthy donors, and pro-Israel legal organizations over its handling of campus protests and allegations of antisemitism. The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law filed a lawsuit against MIT on behalf of Jewish students, naming DeGraff as a defendant and accusing him of targeting Jewish and Israeli members of the community online (a federal judge ultimately dismissed the claims against DeGraff in January 2026). The U.S. House Committee on Education & the Workforce, led by Chairman Tim Walberg, also placed significant political pressure on MIT's administration, explicitly referencing DeGraff's actions in oversight letters.
DeGraff contends that the administration buckled under this external pressure to shut down a pro-Palestinian curriculum. His federal lawsuit, DeGraff v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, alleges that the university violated his academic freedom and suppressed pro-Palestinian speech. He is also suing the U.S. House Committee and its chairman, alleging they violated his First Amendment rights by using government reports to suppress his teaching.
While MIT denies his allegations of political retaliation, DeGraff remains employed by the university on paid status but has been barred from autumn teaching for three consecutive semesters. The case tests the boundaries of what tenure actually guarantees—and whether a university can use the "faculty at large" designation to effectively silence a tenured professor without ever having to fire them.
As the lawsuit moves through federal court, the academic world is watching closely. If MIT's strategy is upheld, it could set a precedent for universities across the country to bypass tenure protections by simply changing a professor's job title rather than terminating their employment.
No Ads. By Us. For Us.
This article was made possible by readers like you. We hope it inspired you to support Emerald Book, so we can continue producing content like this.
We will never show you ads, sell your data, or require a subscription to consume our content. Your gift helps us keep the truth accessible.
Click the Support button to give a gift of any amount today.
Thank you for making this work possible.